BOE STATEMENT: BoE maintains Bank Rate at 3.75%, as expected, in 8-1 vote (exp. 9-0); Pill votes to raise Bank Rate by 25bps to 4%
Every headline is on the live feed 20 minutes before this site.
International Paper Company (IP) Q1 2026 (USD): EPS 0.18 (exp. 0.14), Revenue 5.97bln (exp. 6.02bln)
Altria Group Inc. (MO) Q1 2026 (USD): Adj. EPS 1.32 (exp. 1.25), Revenue 4.76bln (exp. 4.58bln); FY adj. EPS view 5.56-5.72 (exp. 5.62)
BOE STATEMENT: BoE maintains Bank Rate at 3.75%, as expected, in 8-1 vote (exp. 9-0); Pill votes to raise Bank Rate by 25bps to 4%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) Q1 2026 (USD): EPS 1.58 (exp. 1.42), revenue 11.5bln (exp. 10.9bln). Reaffirms 2026 guidance with total revenue & adj. EPS trending toward upper end of ranges
Quanta Services Inc. (PWR) Q1 2026 (USD): Adj. EPS 2.68 (exp. 2.04), Revenue 7.9bln (exp. 7.00bln), Adj. EBITDA 686.4mln (exp. 572.4mln)
On the Newsquawk feed at , 20 minutes before this page.
VOTE
- BoE maintains Bank Rate at 3.75% in 8-1 vote
- Bailey, Breeden, Dhingra, Greene, Lombardelli, Mann, Ramsden, Taylor vote to maintain Bank Rate at 3.75%
- Pill votes to raise Bank Rate by 25 bps to 4%
GUIDANCE
- BoE says policy stance required will depend on scale and duration of energy shock and how it propagates through economy
- BoE says it stands ready to act as necessary to ensure CPI inflation remains on track to meet 2% target in medium term
- BoE says appropriate monetary policy response would be state-contingent
- BoE says more pronounced inflation overshoot as in Scenario C likely to warrant forceful tightening in monetary policy
- BoE says less restrictive policy stance would be required in Scenarios A and B than in Scenario C
- BoE says some members might prefer to act early as insurance against inflation persistence risks
- BoE says other members might prefer more conclusive evidence of inflation persistence before acting
INFLATION
- BoE says Middle East conflict makes prospects for global energy prices highly uncertain
- CPI inflation has increased to 3.3%
- BoE says CPI inflation likely to be higher later this year as higher energy prices pass through
- BoE sees risk of material second-round effects in price and wage-setting, which policy would need to lean against
- BoE says weakening economy could contain inflationary pressures
- BoE says financial conditions have tightened since conflict began and will help reduce inflation over time
- BoE says direct impacts from recent energy supply shock already visible in higher household motor fuel prices
- BoE says indirect effects of high energy prices via increased production costs expected to be significant and likely to affect food prices particularly
- BoE says second-round effects likely to materialise more quickly via pricing channels than wage-setting
- BoE says household short-term inflation expectations have risen
- BoE says wage growth had been easing towards target-consistent rates
- BoE says private sector wage settlements for 2026 had been largely completed before shock occurred
ECONOMY
- BoE says labour market continues to loosen
- BoE says continued weakness in activity would limit strength of second-round effects
- BoE says current events are occurring from starting point of lower inflation, weaker demand, looser labour market and restrictive monetary policy than previous energy shock in 2022
- BoE says unemployment could rise further owing to weak consumption and households increasing precautionary saving
- BoE says energy shocks involve a trade-off between inflation and output
- BoE says all members noted financial conditions had tightened materially since onset of conflict
- BoE says tighter financial conditions would help feed through to lower inflationary pressures over time
FORECASTS
- Bank staff expected CPI inflation to decline to 3.1% on average in 2026 Q2 before rising back to 3.3% in Q3
- BoE says Q3 CPI projection was 1.4 ppts higher than at time of February Monetary Policy Report
- BoE says CPI inflation expected to rise somewhat further in Q4
- April Market Participants Survey median expectation was for Bank Rate to be maintained at current level this year
- Market-implied path for Bank Rate in 15 days to 22 April was upward-sloping, suggesting some increase in Bank Rate this year
- BoE says Scenario A assumes energy prices follow market futures curves with no second-round effects from latest energy shock
- BoE says Scenarios B and C assume energy prices higher and more persistent than futures paths to varying degrees
- BoE says second-round effects are incorporated in Scenarios B and C, and materially so in Scenario C
Pill (lone dissenter)
- Pill says prompt but modest hike in Bank Rate would help mitigate upside risks to price stability. Pill says second-round effects could raise UK inflation beyond near term in persistent manner.
- But I see the risk of second-round effects in each of these scenarios as skewed to the upside. I recognise that second-round effects may be more modest with a looser labour market.
- As someone already concerned about a stalling of the underlying disinflation process even before the latest energy price shock, a prompt but modest hike in Bank Rate will help mitigate upside risks to price stability stemming from a reemergence of intrinsic inflation persistence.
Bailey
- Bailey says softer real economy makes it appropriate to maintain Bank Rate. Bailey places most weight on Scenario B with slightly reduced second-round effects and some weight on Scenario C
- If the shock appears to be short-lived or the economy weaker, policy should place relatively more weight on avoiding unnecessary contraction in activity.
- If second-round effects are likely to be greater, policy should focus on returning inflation back to target more quickly.
Others
- Breeden says financial conditions provide sufficient restrictiveness to guard against current risk of second-round effects. Breeden says she would stand ready to react forcefully if Scenario C materialised
- Dhingra says swift resolution and materially lower energy prices would warrant further reduction in Bank Rate, possibly quickly. Dhingra says worsening situation may warrant some tightening, but there is a limit to acceptable output loss
- Greene says yield curve has tightened enough to give time to hold and learn. Greene says an increase in Bank Rate may be necessary in upcoming meetings
- Lombardelli says holding rates provides appropriate restrictiveness while learning more about scale and propagation of shock. Lombardelli says Scenario C is plausible and would require policy to respond more forcefully to inflationary pressures
- Mann says she expects greater additional second-round effects than in the scenarios. Mann says continued rising inflation outturns and expectations would lead her to expect to increase Bank Rate
- Ramsden says holding Bank Rate is most appropriate response to ongoing uncertainty
- Ramsden says he would consider raising Bank Rate under Scenario B and would favour a less restrictive path if downside risks in Scenario A materialise
- Taylor says current scenario would entail a hold for some time, then a move to neutral or accommodative stance. Taylor says neutral at 3% means it makes sense to hold for risk-management reasons and because tighter financial conditions are amply restrictive
Context
The Bank of England (BoE) has maintained the Bank Rate at 3.75%, which aligns with market expectations. However, the dissent from member Pill, who advocated for a 25 bps hike, reflects growing concerns about inflation persistence and the potential need for a more aggressive monetary policy response if inflationary pressures escalate. This divergence in views highlights the ongoing balancing act the BoE faces between supporting a weakening economy and addressing inflation risks, and it may have implications for future rate path expectations and market sentiment.
Related headlines
- TREASURY WRAP: T-NOTE FUTURES (Z6) SETTLE 2+ TICKS LOWER AT 105-14+1 day ago
- US EQUITY OPEN: Stocks mixed at the open as AI stock rout continues1 day ago
- US Market Wrap: Stocks hit as AI growth concerns weigh on sentiment 1 day ago
- US Midterm Preview: Democrats Favoured to Flip the House, Senate Too Close to Call1 day ago
- Newsquawk European Market Wrap - 16th October 20261 day ago
- Newsquawk Weekly Economic Calendar - 19th-23rd October 20261 day ago
- US FX WRAP: Dollar weighed by Warsh avoiding forward guidance 1 day ago
- Iran Foreign Ministry Spokesperson says Iran is ready to help peacefully resolve issues between Saudi Arabia and Yemen; has always been ready to use best efforts to help resolve the conflict1 day ago
- US White House Press Secretary says on inflation, US President Trump is doing everything he possibly can1 day ago
- Irib reports that the East-West oil pipeline of Saudi Arabia has been targeted once again; adds, detection of a new thermal anomaly in the Yanbu area, near the oil pipeline1 day ago
- US lawmakers introduce bill to block US President Trump’s Russia diesel deal1 day ago
- NY Fed confirms that NatWest (NWG LN) has withdrawn as a primary dealer1 day ago
- CRUDE WRAP: WTI (X6) SETTLES USD 3.44 HIGHER AT USD 101.41/BBL; BRENT (Z6) SETTLES USD 3.94 HIGHER AT USD 109.86/BBL1 day ago
- US President Trump says US economy has never been stronger; regarding oil drilling in Texas, nobody can take a chance on it1 day ago
- US President Trump says Israel has been helpful to Saudi Arabia1 day ago
- US President Trump, when asked about the Ukraine starlink slowdown, says i did not slow it down1 day ago
- Russian President Envoy Dmitriev says Russia and the US discussed in the Arctic and LNG1 day ago
- Reports suggest that a force majeure at a natural gas field has been lifted1 day ago
- Russian Ministry of Defence says that the Tu-22M3 long-range bombers flew over neutral waters of the Baltic Sea, escorted by foreign fighters, according to TASS1 day ago
- China's Commerce Ministry says the EU should not fantasise about gaining benefits through pressure, nor should it underestimate China's determination and ability to safeguard its own interests1 day ago
The feed had this first.
Use the Platform