CRUDE WRAP: WTI (U6) SETTLES USD 3.95 HIGHER AT 82.13/BBL; BRENT (V6) SETTLES USD 4.17 HIGHER AT 87.72/BBL

The crude complex jumped in the first trading session of the week, as US-Iran tensions remain uncertain. Aiding the upside in the US afternoon was a Trump Truth stating, "in response to Iran's requests for compensation during the conflict, he is demanding compensation from Iran, for all of the people that they have killed and gravely wounded with their roadside bombs and many conflicts". Over the weekend, US, Iran and Oman continued negotiating a temporary plan to partially reopen the Strait of Hormuz, although Iran said no immediate reopening was guaranteed. Iran continues to demand major concessions, while disputes remain over banning US/Israeli ships and imposing transit fees under an Oman-Iran traffic-management deal. On that footing, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Iran is currently focused on the Strait of Hormuz rather than resuming negotiations with the US. All-in-all, headline newsflow was very quiet on Monday and WTI and Brent ground higher for the duration of the US day to settle at highs. The headline risk event this week is US CPI on Wednesday.

Rallies of this kind, grinding higher on quiet newsflow with geopolitical risk as the backdrop, are characteristic of risk-premium rebuilding rather than a response to physical disruption; past Hormuz-standoff episodes have tended to price the tail risk of closure well ahead of any actual supply loss, and to unwind the premium quickly once negotiations produce even cosmetic progress. The distinction worth drawing is between rhetoric, which has historically added a temporary premium of a few dollars, and an actual impediment to tanker traffic, where the transmission runs through freight rates, insurance costs and prompt timespreads rather than the flat price alone. The mention of an Oman-mediated traffic-management framework with transit fees and vessel exclusions follows a familiar pattern from prior Gulf standoffs, where interim arrangements have repeatedly been floated, contested and partially implemented before any durable settlement. A settlement at session highs on thin headlines typically signals short covering and momentum participation rather than fresh length, a configuration that has historically left the market exposed to gap risk in both directions on the next headline. The near-term calendar splits the drivers: the negotiation track supplies the binary headline risk, while the week's US CPI print feeds the demand side through the dollar and rate expectations. Watching the shape of the curve and Brent-WTI rather than flat price alone is the established tell for whether the premium reflects genuine supply concern.