Headlines

[PREVIEW] Riksbank Policy Decision due 20th August 2026

Newsquawk Staff ·

  • The Riksbank is expected to leave its policy rate at 1.75%, a view shared by analysts at JPMorgan, SEB and Nordea.
  • While recent inflation has exceeded estimates, a hold is justified as inflation does not significantly deviate from the Riksbank's target.
  • This is an interim meeting, so focus will be on any guidance in the accompanying statement/press conference. Guidance is expected to be reiterated.

OVERVIEW: The Riksbank is widely expected to hold rates steady at 1.75%, a view shared by analysts at Nordea and SEB and corroborated by Reuters and Bloomberg polls. July inflation data showed headline CPIF M/M and Y/Y cooling from the prior readings, albeit remaining above expectations. Core measures remained above the Riksbank's target, albeit only modestly so. Sell-side banks are therefore broadly in consensus that the Riksbank will keep rates on hold in August, though they flag some risk of a hike later in the year. As a reminder, there will be no new forecasts as this is an interim meeting. Attention will therefore be on the accompanying guidance and the press conference at 10:00 BST. Analysts expect the previous guidance to be reiterated, while keeping the door open to action if required.

DATA: CPIF Y/Y printed at 0.7% (exp. 0.6%, prev. 1.3%), while M/M printed at -0.3% (exp. -0.5%, prev. 0.3%). However, core measures remained elevated and above the Riksbank's own target. CPIF ex-energy printed at 0.61% (prev. 0.4%, Riksbank's target 0.24%). Further out, other indicators point to upside risks to the inflation outlook, largely reflecting rising energy prices, transport costs and electronics price rises related to AI. Also fuelling the hawkish argument is a rebound in growth, though the labour market remains subdued.

ANALYST COMMENTARY: SEB believes the Riksbank will keep rates on hold in August, suggesting that a weak labour market and poor resource utilisation give policymakers scope to leave rates unchanged. JPMorgan opines that the "executive board is not in a rush to tighten policy". Further out, sell-side commentary is a little more mixed. SEB and Nordea both expect the Bank to keep rates on hold for the remainder of the year, but see an increasing likelihood of a rate hike due to upside risks to inflation and stronger growth prospects. JPMorgan takes a more decisive view, pencilling in a December hike.

LAST MEETING: In late July, the Riksbank kept rates on hold at 1.75%, as expected. Accompanying commentary was hawkish, noting that the probability of a rate hike in 2026 had increased relative to the March assessment. In the MPR, the policy rate forecast was raised slightly across the horizon, while the CPIF forecast was lowered for 2026 and raised for both 2027 and 2028.

What it means

Interim meetings of this kind, without fresh forecasts, have historically been low-volatility affairs for the smaller European central banks: the rate decision itself rarely surprises, and the information content sits almost entirely in the statement language and press conference, which function as bridges to the next full meeting where projections are actually updated. The setup here is a familiar one in late-cycle tightening debates, core inflation running modestly above target against a weak labour market, a configuration that has on previous occasions produced extended holds with hawkish rhetoric rather than immediate action, since central banks in this position have tended to prefer waiting for the forecast round to legitimise a move. The krona channel in such episodes has typically run through the rate path repricing rather than the decision: an unchanged hold with reiterated guidance tends to leave SEK and front-end Swedish rates little moved, while any shift in the stated probability of a hike, or dissent from the board, does the work. The house view split matters more than the consensus: some desks see the year-end risk as conditional, one has a specific hike pencilled in for the final meeting, so the tell is whether the statement leans toward or away from that camp. Worth watching is any change in the conditional language around the hiking probability relative to the prior meeting, and how energy and transport pass-through is characterised.

Related headlines