There was no agreement between Israeli PM Netanyahu and US Envoy Kushner regarding the continuation of the assassinations. Netanyahu made it clear that he would continue, according to i24news, citing sources

Reporting of this kind, sourced to a single regional outlet citing unnamed officials, sits at the lower end of the geopolitical reliability scale, and desks have learned to treat it as a positioning input rather than confirmed fact until corroborated. The operative signal is the apparent absence of US leverage over Israeli targeting policy: in past episodes where Washington has publicly counselled restraint and been rebuffed, the market read has been a lower probability of near-term de-escalation rather than any change in the conflict's trajectory. The established transmission channel runs through crude, with the risk premium in front-month WTI and Brent building on escalation headlines and bleeding out when no supply disruption follows, a pattern that has repeated across prior rounds of targeted killings where physical flows through the region's chokepoints remained untouched. Gold tends to track the same headline cycle, while the FX expression has historically been concentrated in the havens, with the yen and Swiss franc bid only where the news implies a widening of the conflict to state actors rather than continued bilateral operations. The distinction worth drawing is between assassinations confined to non-state targets, which have typically produced short-lived premium spikes, and any that implicate Iranian soil or personnel, which has been the threshold for sustained repricing. The follow-ons that matter are confirmation from US or Israeli official channels, the character of any retaliation, and whether tanker insurance and freight rates begin to move, which has been the tell that the premium is becoming real rather than rhetorical.