Iran Ministry spokesperson says Iran's re-entry to the negotiation table, after the betrayal of the American side in June, did not mean the existence or creation of trust; entered the conversation with knowledge and mistrust, SNN reports
- Entering into negotiations with the US was done with the premise that any incident (repetition of past events) may happen again; Therefore, at the same time as preparing for negotiations, the country must be fully prepared for any scenario.
- The concerns raised about Iran's nuclear program have no real basis; However, at some point, Iran entered into negotiations and agreements to resolve these claims.
- The other side's withdrawal from the JCPOA showed that Iran's nuclear issue is more of an excuse for pressure than a real concern.
Context
Iran's re-entry into negotiations with the U.S. reflects deep-seated mistrust and a cautious approach, suggesting that any agreement may be fragile. This stance raises questions about the likelihood of progress on sensitive issues, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear program, which could impact global oil supplies and market dynamics. Traders should watch for potential volatility in energy and currency markets, particularly in relation to the USD and commodities like gold, as geopolitical tensions evolve.
Trade the TapeGet this analysis live, the moment it breaksNewsquawk's real-time dashboard delivers market-moving headlines and instant context to your desk before the rest of the market reacts.
Open Dashboard#UNITED STATES#USD#EUR#IRAN#JAPAN#JPY#UNITED KINGDOM#GBP#EUROPE#FOREX#ENERGY#METALS#EU SESSION#US SESSION#WTI#COMMODITIES#GOLD#METALS & MINING#MATERIALS (GROUP)#DXY