US President Trump sends nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress, while he still insists the agreement is contingent on Saudi Arabia normalising relations with Israel, according to WSJ

A US civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia has been under negotiation in various forms for years, and past episodes have followed a recognisable sequence: the administration circulates terms, non-proliferation conditions become the sticking point in Congress, and the deal advances or stalls on whether enrichment and reprocessing safeguards are included. Congressional review is a formal gate, not a formality, and legislators have previously pushed back on Gulf nuclear transfers lacking stringent controls. The explicit linkage to Saudi-Israeli normalisation is the operative condition: on previous occasions the normalisation track has been the harder of the two, and tying the nuclear file to it converts a bilateral energy agreement into a trilateral diplomatic package whose timeline depends on actors outside Washington and Riyadh. The channels that have historically carried this kind of story are crude, where any read-through to Saudi strategic alignment and supply policy matters, and defence and nuclear-services equities, rather than FX, where the tagged currencies tend to be noise. The tells to follow are the agreement's safeguards language, whether Israeli and Saudi officials confirm the conditionality framing, and the congressional committee response.