Anthropic data fears prompt Nvidia (NVDA), Palantir (PLTR) and Booz Allen (BAH) to restrict model use, reports The Information

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 5 more headlines followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

US Interior Secretary Burgum says the Iran war is accelerating a shift in oil production away from the Middle East toward the US and wider Western Hemisphere, Fox News reports

Microsoft (MSFT) has published a new AI "code of conduct", which aims to avoid the development of code that evades human oversight, The Information reports

Anthropic data fears prompt Nvidia (NVDA), Palantir (PLTR) and Booz Allen (BAH) to restrict model use, reports The Information

Nvidia (NVDA) is expanding its open source CUDA-Q platform with CUDA-Q Logical

Three of the biggest names in streaming, Netflix (NFLX), Amazon (AMZN) and YouTube (GOOGL), announced the formation of a new policy coalition to support their positions on key issues, reports Axios

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

Restrictions of this kind, where large customers limit internal use of a model provider over data-handling concerns, sit in a now-familiar pattern around enterprise AI adoption: the binding constraint has repeatedly been governance and data leakage risk rather than model capability, and past episodes of this type have tended to resolve through negotiated deployment terms, on-premise or isolated instances, rather than outright abandonment. The actors matter here: defense-adjacent and government contractors operate under stricter data-security obligations than commercial enterprises, so their caution is partly structural and does not automatically read across to the broader customer base. The distinction worth drawing is between a pause pending security review and a procurement-level exclusion, since the former is common and reversible while the latter flows into revenue with a lag. Attribution to a single press report rather than company confirmation is itself a tell: episodes sourced this way have often been walked back or narrowed once the named firms comment. The follow-ons are on-the-record statements from the companies involved and any indication of whether the restrictions cover one provider or reflect a wider tightening of third-party model usage.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free