Arab sources note the ship targeted in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was a cargo ship, Noor News reports

Vessel identification is the first filter in Bab el-Mandeb incidents, and the distinction that matters is the target profile: attacks on bulk cargo and container ships with no direct flag-state or ownership link to the conflict parties have historically driven the broadest rerouting decisions, while strikes on vessels with identifiable ties have tended to produce shorter-lived freight reactions. The pattern through prior Red Sea episodes has been a familiar sequence: confirmation of ship type and flag, then insurance and war-risk premia repricing, then carrier decisions on Cape of Good Hope diversion, with Suez transit counts the cleanest tell of how seriously the industry is treating the threat. Crude and product tanker rates respond differently from container freight, the former through tonne-mile extension on rerouting, the latter through capacity absorption and schedule disruption, so the cargo-ship identification points first toward the container and dry bulk complex rather than energy. The follow-ons that have mattered in comparable episodes are whether a group claims responsibility, whether naval escort or interdiction statements follow, and whether major carriers issue fresh suspensions of transits. A single incident without claimed attribution or repeat attacks has tended to fade within days; clusters have not.