Headlines

French President Macron refused to accept Interior Minister Nunez's resignation, BFM TV reports

In our morning note

US Market Open, . It led with:

US President Trump said Iran had asked for a halt to US attacks and negotiations are still ongoing. Trump mentioned that he would not use nuclear weapons, but warned that they may have to go to Pickaxe Mountain.

Read the whole note Free to read.

Get the next one free, by email.

Both market-open notes, EU and US, every weekday. No account needed. Unsubscribe any time.

If you trade

This headline was on the Newsquawk live feed at .

Use the Platform opens our news terminal in your browser, with the live headline feed. It’s news, not a broker.

Moved markets ·

Fed’s Waller (voter) says more rate hikes are likely needed to tame inflation, but there is flexibility over the pace and hikes do not need to be consecutive.

DXY, after we published+0.1%

Use the Platform

Free. No signup, no card.

What it means

1 min read

Resignations of senior ministers in French governments have historically been common during periods of political strain, but a presidential refusal to accept one is the more telling signal, marking an effort to preserve cabinet stability rather than allow a fracture to widen. Episodes of this kind tend to resolve in one of two ways: either the refusal holds and the government regroups, or the underlying dispute resurfaces in a more damaging form, via a reshuffle, a confidence test, or a snap move by the president. The actors matter here: Macron's prior form has been to centralise control and resist conceding to pressure, a pattern that has kept governments intact longer but has at times culminated in abrupt resets. The immediate follow-ons are whether the interior minister stays publicly, whether other ministers signal solidarity or distance, and any shift in the president's language on authority. In markets, OAT-Bund spreads have historically been the channel most sensitive to perceived French political instability, with the euro reacting only when instability reads as systemic rather than personnel-level. The distinction worth drawing is between a contained personnel dispute and the start of a broader governmental crisis.

More on this story

Related headlines