Iran Deputy Chairman of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission tells Mehr News that giving concessions to America is a miscalculation; let's not play on the enemy's turf.

Iran Deputy Chairman of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission tells Mehr News that giving concessions to America is a miscalculation; let's not play on the enemy's turf.

Statements of this kind from parliamentary national-security figures are a recurring feature of Iranian engagement cycles: hardline messaging aimed at Washington typically rises in periods when nuclear or sanctions diplomacy is in motion, and has historically functioned more as domestic positioning and negotiating leverage than as a signal of policy reversal. The operative authority on any accommodation with the US sits with the Supreme Leader and the security establishment rather than with commission deputies, so remarks at this level have tended to matter mainly as an indicator of internal factional temperature. For crude, the transmission channel in past episodes has run through expectations for sanctions relief and returning Iranian barrels: rhetoric that closes off negotiation has tended to trim the relief premium embedded in prompt spreads, while actual escalation affecting Gulf transit, insurance and freight is a different and much larger case. The distinction worth drawing is between verbal hardening, which has usually faded from prices quickly, and any follow-through involving enrichment steps, inspections or maritime incidents. Worth watching is whether the tone is echoed by higher bodies and whether scheduled diplomatic rounds proceed on calendar, since cancellation or stalemate has historically been the point at which such rhetoric begins to reprice the supply outlook.