Iran Deputy Speaker of Parliament says Parliament is reviewing the three-point plan to withdraw from the NPT, reports Fars

Iranian parliamentary discussion of leaving the Non-Proliferation Treaty sits in a familiar escalation ladder: prior episodes of this kind have moved through committee review and draft legislation well before any formal notification, and the gap between domestic signalling and actual withdrawal has historically been where the diplomatic off-ramps live. NPT exit carries a formal notice period and a stated justification requirement, which makes it a process rather than a switch, and in comparable past cases the treaty has been used as leverage to be threatened rather than immediately exercised. The transmission channel for crude is the risk premium on a further step toward nuclear breakout and the sanctions and strike scenario that follows it, plus the Strait of Hormuz tail, rather than any immediate change in physical supply; freight and insurance costs tend to reprice before flows do. Speaker-level commentary via state-aligned media is consistent with messaging aimed at an external audience, so the tone of the announcement matters as much as its content. Worth noting is the review process itself: committee handling, whether the plan reaches a floor vote, and any parallel comments from the executive and the security establishment, since parliament has historically been the hawkish rather than the deciding voice on this file. The follow-ons are responses from the Western parties, the IAEA track, and any movement in enrichment or inspector access, which is where rhetoric has previously turned into something priced.