Iran is planning a "major attack" involving Israel due to the pressure it is under, a US official told Israel's Channel 13

Sourced warnings of imminent Iranian action against Israel, attributed to unnamed US officials via Israeli media, have become a recurring feature of this confrontation, and the established pattern is that the warning itself is part of the choreography: pre-attack disclosure has historically preceded telegraphed, interceptable strikes rather than surprises, with both sides having shown a preference for signalling over sustained escalation. The case distinction that matters is between a symbolic, pre-announced salvo of the kind seen in earlier direct exchanges, which markets have tended to fade within sessions, and anything that touches energy infrastructure, shipping through Hormuz, or draws in US forces, which is where crude's geopolitical premium has historically become sticky rather than transient. The sourcing itself is worth noting: a US official briefing Israeli television is a deterrence and shaping channel as much as intelligence, and past episodes of this kind have served to constrain as much as to forewarn. The tells to watch are whether the warning hardens into specifics, whether regional force posture changes accompany it, and how options skew and the prompt crude spread respond, since in prior episodes front-end WTI call buying and Brent time-spread strength have been the cleaner expressions of escalation risk than flat price alone. As an anonymous official quote without detail, this sits at the lower end of the credibility ladder for geopolitical headlines, and comparable warnings have as often dissipated as they have materialised.