Iran urged the UN and member states to reject US economic terrorism and called the US a rogue state, according to Press TV citing comments from Foreign Minister Araghchi

Rhetoric of this kind from Tehran, framed around sanctions as economic warfare and delivered through state media citing the foreign minister, is a recurring feature of the US-Iran standoff and has historically been treated as noise rather than signal unless it coincides with a concrete escalation step. The distinction that matters is between diplomatic positioning at multilateral forums, which this is, and actions that touch physical supply: tanker seizures, attacks on infrastructure, enrichment moves, or withdrawal from negotiating channels. Only the latter category has tended to produce durable risk premia in crude, transmitted through freight rates, insurance costs and the prompt timespreads rather than through the flat price alone. Episodes of sharpened rhetoric without action have typically faded within sessions. The follow-ons worth noting are whether the language is paired with any operational announcement, whether Washington responds in kind or with new designations, and whether regional proxies become more active. As it stands this reads as standard positioning ahead of, or in lieu of, any negotiation track.