Iranian Deputy Chairman of the Parliament's National Security Commission says "A 'new passage' in the Strait of Hormuz, other than the southern route, will soon be announced in the form of a joint statement with Oman"

Routing language around the Strait of Hormuz sits at the intersection of navigation practice and political signalling. Past episodes in which Tehran has spoken about new passages, security arrangements or transit rules in the strait have tended to be declaratory rather than operational, and the established pattern is that actual shipping behaviour shifts only when insurers, classification societies or naval authorities act, not when a parliamentary figure announces intent. The Oman angle is the tell: Muscat has historically served as an intermediary and as a counterparty Tehran uses to project legitimacy, so a joint statement framing suggests diplomatic choreography more than a change in traffic separation schemes. The distinction that matters is between a navigational announcement, which would route through the IMO and hydrographic channels and would be verifiable quickly, and a political one, which circulates as rhetoric and fades. The transmission channel when Hormuz risk genuinely re-prices is freight rates, war-risk premiums and front-month crude spreads, and none of those respond durably to unconfirmed routing talk. Worth watching is whether Oman confirms the statement, whether any IMO filing or notice to mariners follows, and whether the language recurs from higher authorities than a deputy parliamentary chair, since escalation of the messenger has historically been the marker of substance.