Iranian President Pezeshkian says Iran is ready for an agreement with the US and makes demands only within the framework of international law and could give up highly enriched uranium if it reaches an agreement with the US, according to TASS

Iranian readiness signals of this kind have a long history and a consistent failure mode: public flexibility on enrichment ceilings paired with demands framed as non-negotiable, so that the headline position and the actual negotiating gap remain wide apart.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at , 20 minutes before this page
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

Iranian President Pezeshkian says Iran is ready for an agreement with the US and makes demands only within the framework of international law and could give up highly enriched uranium if it reaches an agreement with the US, according to TASS

MGM Resorts (MGM) eyes a bid for Barry Diller’s People Incorporated (PPLI), while an offer could be made in the coming days, according to WSJ

Iran's President Pezeshkian says Tehran wants to revive its ceasefire memorandum of understanding with the US before the November midterm elections, saying Iran does not want talks delayed until after the vote

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

Offers to dilute or ship out highly enriched uranium have surfaced repeatedly in past negotiating rounds and have tended to function as opening positions rather than concessions, with the stockpile's fate, verification terms, and sanctions sequencing the points where talks have historically stalled. The sourcing matters: remarks relayed through a third-party state wire rather than direct bilateral channels have typically carried less weight than statements through established intermediaries, and prior form shows Tehran's president speaking with less authority on nuclear files than the supreme leader's office, whose silence or endorsement is the tell that separates signal from positioning. The distinction that has mattered for crude is between headline de-escalation, which trims the geopolitical risk premium in front-month spreads and freight insurance, and verifiable sanctions relief, which is what actually returns barrels; only the latter has historically moved balances durably. Worth watching is any response from Washington, movement on enrichment verification language, and whether the supreme leader's office echoes the line.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free