Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Gharibabadi details temporary arrangement between Iran and Oman concerning the Strait of Hormuz while asserting that reopening of the waterway hinges on realisation of Tehran's demands, according to Press TV

Conditioning the reopening of Hormuz on Tehran's demands signals the chokepoint is being held as negotiating leverage rather than as an outright military escalation, a distinction that has historically separated short-lived shipping scares from sustained supply disruption. Episodes of this kind have tended to follow a sequence of conditional statements, incremental de-escalation, and partial normalisation of transit before formal resolution, with the risk premium in crude unwinding in stages rather than all at once. The mention of a temporary arrangement with Oman fits a familiar pattern in which Muscat has served as an intermediary channel between Tehran and external parties, so the bilateral detail reads as a diplomatic mechanism rather than a substantive concession. The transmission channels to watch are tanker traffic counts and freight and war-risk insurance rates in the Gulf, which have historically repriced faster than flat crude on headlines like this and stay elevated until transit is visibly normal. The official quoted is a deputy-level figure speaking through state media, which carries less commitment weight than remarks from the Supreme Leader's office or the IRGC, the latter being the actor that has actually controlled enforcement in the strait. Worth tracking is whether Tehran's stated demands are spelled out concretely and whether the IRGC's posture matches the Foreign Ministry's framing, as divergence between the two has on past occasions been the tell that conditions were not yet durable.