Iran’s Foreign Ministry says the security of the Strait of Hormuz will be discussed during the Omani foreign minister’s visit, Al Arabiya reports

Rhetoric around the Strait of Hormuz is a recurring feature of periods of regional tension, and the historical pattern is that it takes the form of signalling rather than actual disruption: full closure has been threatened repeatedly but never executed, partly because it would cut off Iran's own exports and alienate the customers it still has. The transmission channel, when tension escalates, is not lost supply but the insurance and freight layer, where war-risk premia on tankers and the cost of chartering through the chokepoint rise before any barrel is delayed, and that is typically what shows up first in crude pricing. Oman is the established intermediary in this corridor, having hosted back-channel contacts between Tehran and Western parties on prior occasions, so an Omani foreign minister visit is a standard de-escalation format rather than a novelty. The distinction that matters is between talks framed as security dialogue, which historically accompany cooling, and incidents at sea such as seizures or harassment, which accompany heating; headline language about 'discussing security' sits in the former category. Follow-ons worth noting are any tanker incidents in the days around the visit, movement in tanker rates and insurance quotes, and whether the talks produce a joint statement or remain readouts.