Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei says there are no plans to receive a US delegation or send an Iranian delegation in the coming days

Denials of imminent talks from Iranian foreign ministry spokespeople are a recurring fixture in US-Iran engagement cycles and have historically meant less than they appear to: back-channel and indirect formats, often via Gulf or European intermediaries, have repeatedly preceded and accompanied periods of official denial, so the formal absence of delegations says little about whether contacts are live. The read worth drawing is on the sequencing: these statements tend to reflect negotiating position and domestic audience management rather than a terminal breakdown, and prior episodes of public coolness have been followed by resumed contact within weeks rather than months. For crude, the operative channel is the risk premium embedded in prompt spreads and options skew rather than flat price alone; rhetoric of this kind has typically trimmed only a modest portion of any premium built on escalation fears, with the larger moves reserved for confirmed meetings or confirmed strikes. The distinction that matters is between a scheduling denial, which this is, and a rejection of the framework under discussion, which would carry more weight. Follow-ons are statements from the US side, comments from intermediary governments, and any movement in enrichment or inspection posture, since those have historically been the tells that distinguish posturing from rupture.