Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson says that Iran has no interference in Yemen

Denials of this kind from Tehran are a standard feature of the Iran-Yemen file and have historically carried little informational weight on their own: Iranian officials have consistently rejected involvement with the Houthis regardless of the underlying facts, so the statement functions as boilerplate rather than signal. What has mattered for the crude complex in these episodes is not the rhetoric but the operational tempo, attack frequency on Red Sea shipping, seizure incidents, and any direct Iran-Israel or Iran-US exchange, since it is freight rates, insurance premia and rerouting around the Cape that transmit into physical differentials rather than official statements. The distinction worth drawing is between denial aimed at de-escalation, which has sometimes preceded quieter periods, and denial issued while attacks continue, which the market has learned to discount entirely. The follow-ons are the shipping incident tape, coalition strike activity, and whether any sanctions or interdiction action names Iranian supply chains directly. A single spokesperson remark of this sort has rarely moved WTI beyond the noise band; positioning tends to respond to the next kinetic data point.