Iran's Major General Rezaei says Dahiyeh and Beirut are their red lines, a possible war is different from previous wars, reports Irib

• Monitoring and keeping an eye on the situation with full seriousness. Israel will be forced to withdraw from the occupied areas in Lebanon.
• In the event of a resumption of the conflict, we are preparing ourselves for a new stage; Any future war will be different from previous wars.

Rhetoric of this kind from senior Iranian military figures, delivered through state media, is a recurring feature of the Iran-Israel-Hezbollah standoff and has historically served a deterrent and domestic-audience function rather than signalling imminent action. The market-relevant distinction in past episodes has been between verbal escalation, which has tended to produce brief, fading risk premia in crude and the dollar, and kinetic action involving Iranian or proxy forces directly, which is what has durably repriced energy supply risk through freight, insurance, and the front of the oil curve. The invocation of red lines around Beirut's southern suburbs points to the Hezbollah axis rather than a direct state-to-state channel, and proxy-linked escalation has historically carried a smaller and shorter-lived premium than direct confrontation. Track record matters: warnings framed around a future war being different from previous ones are a familiar formula and have preceded both de-escalation and escalation, so the language alone is not a reliable tell. What has mattered in comparable sequences is the follow-on: force movements, actual strikes in Lebanon, any shift in the tone of diplomatic back-channels, and whether oil-linked shipping costs begin to move. As headline risk rather than an event, the signal is directional and low-conviction until corroborated on the ground.