Iran's National Security Committee spokesperson Qashqavi says enemy nuclear threats reinforce the case for changing Iran's nuclear doctrine, Sabereen reports

Iran's National Security Committee spokesperson Qashqavi says enemy nuclear threats reinforce the case for changing Iran's nuclear doctrine, Sabereen reports.

Talk of revising Iran's nuclear doctrine has surfaced periodically from security and parliamentary figures, typically framed as deterrence signalling in response to Israeli or Western threats rather than as a formal policy shift. The established pattern is that such comments from a committee spokesperson carry less weight than statements from the Supreme Leader's office or the IRGC leadership, since doctrine in this domain is set at the top and rhetorical escalation from mid-level officials has on past occasions preceded negotiation as often as escalation. The distinction that matters is between messaging aimed at raising leverage and any concrete step, such as higher enrichment levels, reduced inspector access, or withdrawal from non-proliferation commitments, since it is the verifiable actions that have historically moved crude and regional risk premia rather than the rhetoric itself. Transmission in comparable episodes has run through front-end oil via supply-disruption and insurance pricing rather than broader risk sentiment, with moves tending to fade absent physical follow-through. Worth noting next is whether the framing is echoed by more senior figures, whether it coincides with IAEA or enrichment developments, and how it interacts with any ongoing diplomatic channel.