Israeli PM Netanyahu says "I will inform [US President] Trump of what we intend to do, but I will not ask him for the green light to strike Iran", Al Arabiya reports

Israeli PM Netanyahu says "I will inform [US President] Trump of what we intend to do, but I will not ask him for the green light to strike Iran", Al Arabiya reports.

Public framing of a strike decision as notification rather than permission-seeking fits a long pattern in this conflict: Israeli leaders have historically asserted operational independence vis-a-vis Washington precisely when action is close, while still briefing the US president, since American foreknowledge shapes the retaliation calculus in Tehran and the air-defence umbrella over the Gulf. The distinction worth drawing is between signalling and imminence: episodes of this kind have tended to oscillate between escalatory rhetoric and actual strikes, and the market tell separating them has been whether crude and gold hold their risk premium into the following sessions or fade it, with the Brent-Dubai spread, tanker and insurance rates through Hormuz, and the shape of the crude curve the usual transmission channels rather than outright supply loss. Safe-haven precedent in comparable stand-offs runs through the dollar, yen and gold, with the yen reaction historically blunted when the shock lifts energy import costs for Japan. The actors' prior form matters: Netanyahu has repeatedly used US-facing rhetoric to pre-position blame and deterrence, and Trump's responses in past episodes have swung between urging restraint and post-facto endorsement. What is worth watching next is any US statement of support or distance, movement of carriers and air assets in the region, and whether Iranian proxies are activated, since proxy involvement has been the historical trigger for a durable rather than transient repricing.