Omani and Iranian Foreign Ministers discuss conditions for resuming negotiations that support resumption of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, according to Omani State News Agency.

Omani-mediated contacts of this kind follow a familiar template: Muscat has long served as the back-channel of choice between Tehran and Western or regional counterparties, and foreign-minister-level discussions framed around 'conditions for resuming negotiations' typically precede any substantive de-escalation by weeks rather than days. The operative distinction is between talks about navigation and an actual restoration of tanker traffic: past episodes around the Strait of Hormuz have shown that crude, freight rates, and war-risk insurance premia reprice on physical flows and insurer behaviour, not on diplomatic communiqués, and tend to normalise only after a sustained period of incident-free transits. The mention of navigation as the explicit subject matters more than the participants; linkage of shipping security to a broader negotiating track has historically been Tehran's preferred sequencing. Worth watching next are tanker tracking data through the strait, any statement from the other side of the negotiation, and whether insurance underwriters adjust Gulf transit premia, as those are the channels through which headline diplomacy has previously translated into energy market pricing.