Poland PM Tusk says he hopes to resubmit crypto bill to parliament after vetoes

A head of government promising to resubmit legislation after a presidential veto is a familiar sequence in Polish politics, where executive splits have repeatedly turned major bills into multi-round contests between the government majority and the presidency. The precedent in such standoffs is that resubmission without a fresh compromise tends to produce the same outcome, since overriding a veto requires a supermajority that governments of this profile have rarely commanded; the tell is whether the bill returns amended or unchanged. On the substance, crypto bills of this kind in EU member states now sit in the shadow of the bloc-wide MiCA framework, which narrows the room for national divergence and shifts the operative question from whether crypto is regulated to how domestic licensing and supervisory mandates are allocated among local authorities. That distinction matters for where the friction lands: national-level provisions on enforcement powers and the transition of existing registered entities, rather than the underlying rules, are typically where vetoes have concentrated. Worth noting is that the delay itself is the operative fact for affected firms, prolonging interim regimes and pushing compliance timelines. The follow-ons are the text of the resubmitted bill, any signal from the presidency on acceptable terms, and the alignment timetable with EU-level deadlines.