Regarding the overnight attack on Saudi Arabia, sources suggest oil facilities were also targeted, Nour News reports

Attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure are the single most tested template in the Gulf risk playbook, and the market's first question is always the same: whether processing and export capacity was actually hit or merely targeted. Episodes of this kind have historically split sharply on that distinction, with confirmed damage to throughput producing a durable repricing of the geopolitical premium while failed or intercepted strikes have tended to fade within sessions. The transmission channel is concentrated spare capacity: the Kingdom holds a large share of the world's readily available buffer, so any threat to its facilities tightens the effective global cushion and steepens the front of the crude curve via backwardation rather than moving the whole strip equally. Worth establishing is the source's proximity to official confirmation, since attribution through an affiliated news agency often precedes a formal Saudi or coalition statement that sets the retaliation track. The follow-ons are damage assessments, shipping and insurance behaviour in the Gulf, and whether any response targets the presumed sponsor, which is where past episodes have either escalated into sustained premia or de-escalated into headline noise. Until the extent of physical damage is confirmed, the move sits in the risk-premium category rather than a genuine supply shock.