Russia President Putin says CBR monetary policy is not too tight

Public defence of the central bank by the head of state is a recurring feature of the Russian policy setup, where the CBR has periodically come under pressure from government and business constituencies arguing that restrictive rates are throttling credit and growth.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 10 more headlines followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

European PPI (Jul MM) 1.6% vs. Exp. 1.2% (Prev. -0.3%)

Spain sells EUR 5.634bln vs exp. EUR 5-6bln 2.35% 2029, 2.60% 2031 and 3.30% 2036 Bono and EUR 0.639bln vs exp. EUR 0.25-0.75bln 2.05% 2039 I/L Bono

Russia President Putin says CBR monetary policy is not too tight

Japanese Finance Minister Katayama says no direct requests to do anything has been given from US Treasury Secretary Bessent

[MARKET ANALYSIS] European bourses tilt higher, Elliott reportedly pushes DTE GY to scrap TMUS merger; AVGO misses Q4 guidance estimates

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

Statements of this kind have historically served to insulate the governor and signal that the rate stance has political cover, which matters because the bank's independence is the variable markets price first when that cover is in doubt. The read is that the prevailing tight stance is more likely to persist than to be forced into an early reversal, which supports the front end of the OFZ curve and the rouble carry case rather than challenging it. The distinction worth drawing is between endorsement of the current level and endorsement of the trajectory: the headline addresses the former, leaving the easing path itself unaddressed. Follow-ons are the tone of the next CBR communications and whether criticism from the business lobby quiets, since a silenced lobby has on previous occasions preceded an extended hold. As rhetorical backing rather than a policy signal, it removes a tail risk rather than adding new information.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free