Senior Iranian lawmaker Azizi warns foreign forces to leave the region "before it's too late" , Press TV reports

Rhetoric of this kind from Iranian parliamentarians is a recurring feature of Gulf tension cycles and has historically carried limited weight on its own, since foreign policy and kinetic decisions sit with the Supreme National Security Council and the IRGC rather than with individual lawmakers or state broadcaster commentary. The established pattern is that legislator warnings through Press TV function as signalling and domestic positioning, while the market-relevant escalation markers have been statements from the supreme leader's office, IRGC commanders, or the foreign ministry, and above all any movement around the Strait of Hormuz, where a large share of seaborne crude and LNG transits. The transmission channel in comparable episodes has run through crude premia, tanker freight and war-risk insurance rates, with the distinction drawn between verbal escalation, which has tended to fade quickly, and physical interference with shipping or attacks on regional infrastructure, which has sustained moves. A senior lawmaker also falls short of the president or security establishment, so the tell is whether the language is picked up by higher-authority figures or accompanied by naval or proxy activity. Follow-ons worth noting are official responses from the US or regional states, any OPEC-member commentary, and shipping advisories. As it stands this reads as headline noise within an established rhetorical pattern rather than a shift in posture.