Senior Iranian Source says situation on the battleground demonstrates Iran's readiness for a long-term confrontation with the US, reports Tass

Statements of this kind, relayed through Russian state wire channels, are part of a familiar signalling pattern in US-Iran standoffs: Tehran frames itself as prepared for attrition precisely when it wants to raise the perceived cost of escalation, and similar rhetoric has historically preceded negotiation rather than open conflict. The sourcing matters: an anonymous senior figure quoted via Tass is a lower-fidelity channel than official IRGC or foreign ministry statements, and on previous occasions such secondhand attribution has served more as posturing than as an operational read. The distinction worth drawing is between rhetoric aimed at deterrence and concrete moves, since past episodes of this kind have only durably repriced risk when accompanied by shipping incidents, proxy activity, or visible force posture changes rather than verbal escalation alone. The transmission channel, when it materialises, runs through crude via the risk premium on Gulf transit and through freight and insurance costs on tanker routes, with the front of the oil curve reacting fastest. The tells to watch are whether named officials adopt the same framing, any movement around Strait of Hormuz shipping, and whether US force deployments in the region are actually extended as the source suggests. As it stands, this is directional commentary rather than an event.