Some Chinese commercial banks have raised US dollar deposit rates above 3% and subsequently increased purchases of US Treasuries in recent months, sources suggest

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 2 more headlines followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

France to announce EUR 1bln in farmers' aid following the summer heatwaves, BFM TV reports

UMC (UMC / 2303 TT) reports August revenue TWD 25bln (+31% Y/Y)

Some Chinese commercial banks have raised US dollar deposit rates above 3% and subsequently increased purchases of US Treasuries in recent months, sources suggest

US Envoy Witkoff and Kushner are reportedly to travel to Kyiv and Moscow in the coming days, TASS reports citing sources

European Equity pre-Market Summary - 4th September 2026: Equities continue to benefit from Waller's dovish comments, markets look ahead to US NFP

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

Episodes in which onshore Chinese dollar funding becomes scarcer than offshore funding have historically produced this exact chain: commercial banks bid up dollar deposit rates to retain household and corporate FX balances, then deploy the proceeds into the most liquid dollar asset available, which is the front and belly of the Treasury curve. The tell here is the deposit rate itself, since dollar deposit pricing inside China normally tracks policy-guided ceilings rather than market clearing levels, and a move above them signals genuine dollar scarcity rather than a portfolio decision. The actors matter: Chinese state and joint-stock banks have prior form as a price-insensitive marginal buyer of Treasuries when onshore dollar liabilities rise, a pattern that has on past occasions provided a steady bid at the front end even while official reserve data showed flat or declining foreign holdings, because the purchases run through the commercial banking system rather than the reserve manager. The distinction worth drawing is between reserve-driven and bank-driven demand: the former shows up in official holdings data with a lag, the latter tends to surface first in custody and survey data and is easier to reverse if dollar funding conditions ease. The follow-ons are onshore dollar liquidity indicators, the gap between Chinese and offshore dollar deposit pricing, and whether purchase flows persist in the next rounds of cross-border holdings data. Directionally, this is a structural-bid story for the front of the Treasury curve rather than a comment on US rate policy.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free