Source says Iran is prepared to compromise on its nuclear programme but wants guarantees Israel will not attack again after a US deal, N12 reports

The demand for guarantees against further Israeli strikes is the harder ask, since Washington has historically been unable or unwilling to bind Israeli operational freedom, and episodes of this kind have tended to stall precisely on the security-assurance question rather than on enrichment limits or inspection regimes. Sourcing matters here: single-outlet Israeli media reports have on previous occasions functioned as trial balloons or negotiating leverage rather than confirmed positions, and past rounds have repeatedly produced optimistic leaks followed by public walk-backs from Tehran. The established transmission channel is the crude risk premium, with WTI and Brent repricing on the perceived probability of supply disruption through the Gulf, and a secondary dollar and safe-haven leg when escalation risk rises. What distinguishes this report is the sequencing: compromise offered after strikes, not before, which in prior episodes has cut both ways, either as genuine damage limitation or as time-buying. The follow-ons worth noting are any confirmation or denial from Iranian officials, the US response on the guarantee question, and whether talks resume on a formal calendar rather than through intermediaries.