Ukraine's foreign ministry spokesman says Ukrainian President Zelensky and US President Trump may meet during the UN General Assembly

Tentative bilateral scheduling of this kind is standard pre-UNGA positioning; the annual assembly has historically served as a venue for high-profile side meetings precisely because it lets both sides gauge the other without committing to a formal summit. The operative distinction is between a meeting that produces a framework for ceasefire or negotiation talks and one that amounts to optics, and past episodes in this conflict have shown markets distinguishing sharply between the two: concrete negotiating formats have tended to soften European gas and crude risk premia and firm the euro, while photo-op encounters have faded within sessions. Ukraine-related headlines have also repeatedly been walked back or downgraded before the event itself, so confirmation from both capitals matters more than the spokesman's framing. The follow-ons worth noting are any readout on US security guarantees or aid conditionality, Kremlin response, and whether European leaders are folded into the format. As a may-meet headline, the signal is preliminary and the market reaction typically thin until the meeting is confirmed.