US PCE Prices Final (Q2 QQ) 5.0% vs. Exp. 5.3% (Prev. 4.6%)

Final revisions of this kind rarely set the tone on their own; the market's working assumption is that the advance and preliminary prints have already been absorbed, and the residual repricing on a final reading tends to be confined to the front end unless the revision changes the quarter's narrative.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at , 20 minutes before this page
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

US PCE Prices Final (Q2 QQ) 5.0% vs. Exp. 5.3% (Prev. 4.6%)

Merck's (MRK) tulisokibart met primary and key secondary endpoints in Phase 2b study in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa

US ADP Employment Change (Sep) 90K vs. Exp. 70K (Prev. 38K)

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

The notable feature here is the pattern across prints: an acceleration from the prior quarter alongside a downward revision against consensus, a combination that leaves the direction of the inflation impulse higher but the level softer than feared. In past episodes of this kind the live question has been less the quarter being finalised than what it implies for the deflator pipeline into the monthly PCE series the Fed actually targets, since the quarterly price index and the monthly core readings can diverge in their signal. Watch items are whether the revision concentrates in goods or services components, how it feeds the next monthly core PCE estimate, and whether Fed commentary treats the elevated quarterly run rate as stale or as evidence of persistence. As a backward-looking confirmation, the print is more likely to calibrate than to redirect the rate path.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free