US Personal Spending (Aug MM) 0.9% vs. Exp. 0.8% (Prev. 0.1%)

A modest upside beat on nominal personal spending, with the prior month also revised higher, points to a consumer that kept spending through the period rather than the stalling the initial print had implied.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at , 20 minutes before this page
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

US Personal Spending (Aug MM) 0.9% vs. Exp. 0.8% (Prev. 0.1%)

Merck's (MRK) tulisokibart met primary and key secondary endpoints in Phase 2b study in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa

US ADP Employment Change (Sep) 90K vs. Exp. 70K (Prev. 38K)

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

The distinction that matters for the rates read is nominal versus real: this release typically arrives alongside the PCE price data, and strong nominal spending paired with firm prices has historically been the configuration that steepens the front end, while strong spending with soft inflation tends to be absorbed as growth-positive rather than hawkish. Revisions of this size to the prior month often carry as much information as the headline surprise, since they reframe the trend rather than the one-month signal. The transmission channel is the consumption contribution to growth tracking estimates and, through that, the path of the policy-sensitive front of the curve and the dollar. The follow-ons are the accompanying income and savings components, which indicate how durable the spending pace is, and whether the composition skews toward goods or services, the latter being the stickier inflation feed. Single data points of this kind have tended to fade unless corroborated by the broader consumption complex.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free