US President Trump bans CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from the White House due to fake news

Restricting specific outlets from the White House press pool has precedent: this administration previously barred a major wire service from pooled events, a move that was challenged in court on First Amendment grounds and produced mixed judicial outcomes.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 1 more headline followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

Houthi says Saudi Arabia has called for Iran's mediation with Yemen, reports Fars

NASA is in talks with Boeing (BA) to expand Starliner missions, including the potential for 10 or more new flights, according to the WSJ

US President Trump bans CNN, MSNOW, and Politico from the White House due to fake news

Novo Nordisk (NOVOB DC) says there are stable Ozempic supplies across Canada

FHFA Director Pulte says Fannie and Freddie "are beginning to buy even more, large quantities" of MBS

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.

Full Post: "I am proud to announce that, effective immediately, I am banning Fake News CNN, MSNOW (who recently changed their name from MSNBC due to lack of viewership and credibility!), and Politico (The recipients of an illegal and ridiculous $8 Million Dollar subscription, an All Time Record, directly from the United States Government, under Crooked Joe Biden, in order to keep them “alive.” Seems like corruption to me!), from the White House as a result of their constant “reporting” FAKE NEWS! Media Outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America. Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

Context

Episodes of this kind have tended to follow a familiar sequence: an immediate legal challenge, trade-association statements, and eventual partial accommodation, rather than a durable exclusion. The reference to an alleged government subscription contract suggests a parallel line of attack through procurement and funding reviews, which is where the policy has tended to bite harder than access restrictions themselves. The threat that other outlets will follow is the operative sentence, since a widening list changes this from symbolic gesture to structural press-pool question. For markets this is a headline with no established transmission channel: prior rounds of executive-press conflict have not moved the dollar, rates, or equities beyond the intraday noise floor. What is worth watching is the litigation track and whether any funding or contract action follows, as that is where past episodes have had durable consequences.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free