US President Trump posts "I am the Hoax Buster, and I’m right now breaking another Hoax — That AI is going to take over, consume, and destroy the World, and that Robots will be marching into our Cities, and getting rid of us all!"

Presidential social media posts of this kind, rhetorical and unconnected to any policy instrument, have historically been noise rather than signal for the tape; the pattern across prior episodes is that price discovery follows executive orders, agency actions and legislative text, not commentary.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 2 more headlines followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

US President Trump called NVIDIA (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang to discuss AI, according to NYT

Flight operations halted at Saudi's King Fahd airport in Dammam, according to SNN

US President Trump posts "I am the Hoax Buster, and I’m right now breaking another Hoax — That AI is going to take over, consume, and destroy the World, and that Robots will be marching into our Cities, and getting rid of us all!"

Sysco (SYY) announces USD 1bln common stock offering

Trump's statement on an energy truce "an impromptu move", reports Russian press citing sources; adds at the latest talks in Moscow between the American delegation and Putin, no decision was made on an energy truce

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.

Full post "I am the Hoax Buster, and I’m right now breaking another Hoax — That AI is going to take over, consume, and destroy the World, and that Robots will be marching into our Cities, and getting rid of us all! This is even wilder than the RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA HOAX, or the Global Warming Scam. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"

Context

The substantive thread here is the administration's posture toward the AI complex, where the operative questions remain export controls on advanced chips, antitrust posture toward the largest platforms, energy permitting for data centre buildout, and any federal preemption of state-level AI rules. A dismissive stance toward AI risk rhetoric reads as consistent with a deregulatory tilt, but rhetoric of this kind has not in the past been a reliable guide to where rulemaking lands. The distinction worth drawing is between sentiment noise around mega-cap AI names and the actual transmission channels, which run through chip export licensing, power and grid policy, and procurement. Follow-ons that matter are agency-level actions and any staff-level commentary that converts the tone into policy, rather than the post itself. As a market input, this is colour.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free