US President Trump says Iran strikes will be limited; Strait of Hormuz is in extremely good shape; A lot of oil coming out of Hormuz; Ships came through Hormuz last night with Navy assist

• Averaging 30 ships a night out of Hormuz.
• On Iran, we'll see what happens.

Remarks from a head of state downplaying disruption to Hormuz follow a familiar pattern in past Gulf transit episodes: official reassurance on shipping flows has historically been the first signal that the worst-case closure scenario is being taken off the table, with crude's geopolitical risk premium unwinding before freight rates and war-risk insurance follow. The operative distinction is between actual transit volume, which the President addresses directly here, and the insurance and chartering side, where underwriters and owners have tended to lag political assurances by days or weeks, keeping delivered costs elevated after spot crude has already repriced. Naval escort of commercial traffic is itself a precedent-laden arrangement; prior escort operations in these waters have generally coincided with elevated but contained tension rather than resolution, and have on occasion produced single-incident flare-ups that briefly re-inflated the premium. The qualifier that strikes will be limited, paired with 'we'll see what happens', leaves the escalation path open, and historically the market has treated such conditional language as a ceiling on rather than an end to the risk bid. Worth watching are tanker tracking data against the claimed nightly flow, insurance quotes on the route, and any Iranian official response, since Tehran's posture rather than Washington's framing has set the next move in comparable sequences. The tell on sustainability is whether regional producers and Asian buyers alter nomination and routing behaviour, which has been the more durable signal than headline commentary.