White House deputy national security adviser Andy Baker will leave the administration in coming weeks, Axios reports

• Baker was among the officials most involved in foreign-policy and national-security decision-making over the previous 18 months.
• A source close to Baker said he wants to spend more time with his family and stayed on months longer than planned.

Departures of senior national security officials are a recurring feature of administrations past their first year, and the stated reason, staying longer than planned for family reasons, matches the standard framing for routine rather than forced exits. The read that matters for policy continuity is whether a departure of someone described as central to foreign-policy decision-making signals a shift in the balance of advice reaching the president, since portfolios at this level tend to be redistributed among existing deputies rather than filled by like-for-like replacements. In past episodes, turnover inside the national security apparatus has occasionally preceded changes in tone on sanctions, alliance posture, or negotiating strategy, but more often has proven to be personnel churn with no discernible policy follow-through. The distinction worth drawing is between a resignation on amicable terms, as reported here, and one tied to a policy dispute, since the latter has historically been the kind that presages actual change. Follow-ons are the naming of a successor, any parallel departures that would suggest a broader reshuffle, and whether the exit is accompanied by public disagreement. As it stands this reads as staffing news with no immediate market transmission channel.