Iranian Foreign Ministry says that at the current time, they do not believe the Pakistani Army Chief is in Tehran

Iranian Foreign Ministry says that at the current time, they do not believe the Pakistani Army Chief is in Tehran.

Denials of this kind are routine in diplomatic signalling between two states that have exchanged strikes or accusations, and historically the wording matters more than the substance: a denial framed around the present moment ('at the current time') leaves room for earlier or later presence and is a common formula for de-escalation without full retraction. Episodes of cross-border tension involving Iran and Pakistan have previously followed a sequence of kinetic exchange, hostile rhetoric, then managed walk-back through official statements, with both sides having form for compartmentalising military friction from the broader trade and energy relationship. For crude and freight pricing, the established pattern is that rhetoric alone fades quickly, while any confirmation of senior military figures shuttling between capitals tends to precede either back-channel de-escalation or coordination, so clarification of who is actually talking to whom is the real tell. Follow-ons worth noting are any statement from the Pakistani side, which typically confirms or quietly contradicts, and whether airspace, border, or shipping advisories in the Gulf change, since those are the channels through which such episodes have transmitted to oil and insurance costs in the past.