Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei says Tehran has no fear of diplomacy and use dialogue as a tool to meet the interests of Iran

• Iran participates in every diplomatic process with maximum caution and complete skepticism.
• The realisation of any understanding is contingent upon a definitive commitment to stopping the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon.

Statements of this kind from an Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson are the standard opening posture in any negotiation or de-escalation cycle: public receptivity to dialogue paired with maximalist conditions. The pairing is familiar from past episodes, where Tehran couples willingness to talk with demands that function less as terms than as markers of negotiating position. The operative content here is the conditionality, specifically the linkage of any understanding to a halt in fighting on all fronts, Lebanon included. Widening the frame from a bilateral or nuclear track to a regional one raises the bar for any deal and typically signals a lengthening timeline rather than an imminent breakthrough. The 'maximum caution and complete skepticism' formulation is also boilerplate for the domestic audience and carries little informational weight on its own. For the oil market, the transmission channel in comparable episodes runs through the geopolitical risk premium embedded in crude and through freight and insurance costs on Gulf-linked routes; conciliatory language alone has rarely removed that premium, which historically comes out only on verifiable de-escalation steps. The tells worth noting are whether counterparts publicly engage the conditions, whether the language recurs or hardens in subsequent statements, and whether back-channel activity produces any follow-up at the envoy level.