Iranian spokesperson Baghaei says "the compression of Tehran's seven-day proposal and the possibility of implementing it in two days is a sign of the Islamic Republic's goodwill"

• "The talks are ongoing and the issues are very complex, and the passage of time has added to the complexity given America's actions; the exchange of messages is ongoing and America must make a decision. We conveyed everything that was necessary to the American side in a reasonable format."

Rhetoric of goodwill from Tehran's foreign ministry apparatus is a recurring feature of drawn-out negotiation cycles, and has historically signalled positioning ahead of a deadline rather than substantive concession. The operative content here is procedural: compression of a proposal timeline, continued message exchange through intermediaries, and the onus explicitly placed on Washington, a framing Iran has used repeatedly to shape blame attribution if talks stall. In past episodes of this kind, the crude market has tended to fade headline optimism unless accompanied by movement on verifiable specifics, sanctions sequencing, enrichment limits, or inspection access, since goodwill language has preceded both breakthroughs and breakdowns. The transmission channel for WTI and Brent is the expected path of Iranian export volumes: a credible track toward a deal raises the prospect of incremental barrels returning, while a collapse restores the risk premium on Gulf supply and shipping insurance. Worth watching is whether the American side confirms receipt and reciprocates the framing, and whether the compressed two-day window produces a concrete response rather than further process talk. Until then, the headline reads as diplomacy by communiqué, directionally softer for crude but well within the established pattern of noise around these talks.