White House has asked OpenAI and Anthropic not to share their new AI models with the UK testing agency until the models have gone through testing with the US government first, according to a Politico reporter

This fits an emerging pattern of governments asserting jurisdiction over frontier AI model releases before they circulate to foreign allies, echoing how strategic technologies have historically been managed as national security assets rather than commercial products.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at , 20 minutes before this page
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

White House has asked OpenAI and Anthropic not to share their new AI models with the UK testing agency until the models have gone through testing with the US government first, according to a Politico reporter

New Zealand's Finance Minister names Rebecca Williams to the RBNZ MPC

Iranian President Pezeshkian says Iran is ready for an agreement with the US and makes demands only within the framework of international law and could give up highly enriched uranium if it reaches an agreement with the US, according to TASS

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

The operative distinction is between closed-weight model providers, who can gate access and sequence disclosure to regulators, and open-source releases, which are far harder to police; the sector has been bracing for exactly this kind of scrutiny. The counterparty that matters here is the UK AI testing outfit, whose value depends on early access to frontier models; being pushed behind Washington in the queue dilutes its relevance and underscores who sets the terms of the AI safety agenda. Watch for whether this becomes a formal requirement or remains ad hoc guidance, whether the affected labs push back, and any signs of friction with London over the optics of US-first access. As with earlier US-China chip and software controls, compliance burden and approval sequencing are the channels that matter for timelines, while Microsoft and other hyperscalers face second-order exposure through their partnership and infrastructure commitments. The next step is any written guidance from the White House and the response of the affected labs.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free