Fed Chair Warsh says yet for more than 5 years, inflation has been running above target

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 16 more headlines followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

Fed Chair Warsh confirms he was the one that did not submit a dot plot, as expected

Fed Chair Warsh says in July expressed joint readiness to act and the FOMC decided that this standard has not been satisfied and the committee's unanimous vote shows our resolve to achieve price stability on a timelier basis

Fed Chair Warsh says yet for more than 5 years, inflation has been running above target

Fed Chair Warsh highlights the strength of the US labour market

Fed Chair Warsh says decision comes when the economy appears to be strengthening and is pointing in a good direction

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
  • Predominant focus is on the price stability side of our mandate. The plain fact is that inflation is too high and has been, for too long.
  • This summer's inflation readings do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved.
  • Based on the most recent CPI and PPI data, the 12-month change in total PCE prices likely was around 3.6% in August. Core PCE and CPI prices running at about 3.2% and 2.4% respectively.
  • Since first FOMC meeting as chairman, my colleagues and I have been unequivocal in our commitment to price stability. And to our 2% PCE inflation objective. At our July meeting, we all agreed that inflation remained too high. And we expressed our joint readiness to act.
Context

A chair who frames inflation as above target for more than five years and leads with the price stability side of the mandate is delivering a hawkish signal of the kind that historically accompanies either a prolonged hold at restrictive rates or an argument for further tightening, and the transmission runs through the front end and real yields rather than the long end alone. The key analytical tell is the sequencing: citing the PCE estimate derived from CPI and PPI before the official print is a recognised practice for signalling the committee's internal read on the data, and emphasising that summer readings show no meaningful improvement closes the door on the soft-data case for easing. The reference to colleagues agreeing at the prior meeting that inflation was too high, and to a joint readiness to act, reads as consensus-building language; remarks of that structure have tended in past cycles to precede action rather than substitute for it. Worth watching is whether other officials echo the same framing, since the median voter rather than the chair sets the path, and how the next PCE print compares with the estimate cited here, since chairs who pre-commit to a number expose themselves to the release. The gap between total and core measures in the cited figures also matters: when headline runs above core, the debate shifts to energy and food pass-through, which central banks have historically looked through only if expectations stay anchored.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free