Iranian lawmaker Moghadam says the Defence Ministry and IRGC are ready to produce missiles with a range of 6,000km initially, with plans to extend their range to 10,000km, 12,000km and 15,000km to reach US territory, SNN reports

Iranian lawmaker Moghadam says the Defence Ministry and IRGC are ready to produce missiles with a range of 6,000km initially, with plans to extend their range to 10,000km, 12,000km and 15,000km to reach US territory, SNN reports.

Claims of this kind from Iranian lawmakers and semi-official outlets have historically been posturing rather than programme announcements; a single parliamentarian speaking through an outlet close to the IRGC does not carry the weight of a test or a Defence Ministry statement, and previous episodes of extended-range rhetoric have tended to signal intent and deterrence positioning more than near-term capability. The usual sequence is that genuinely market-relevant developments in Iran's missile programme arrive through observable tests or defence-ministry confirmation, while rhetorical escalation of this sort has faded without follow-through. Where such headlines have touched markets at all, the transmission has run through the crude risk premium tied to regional escalation and Gulf shipping rather than through the missile claim itself, since range extensions aimed at US territory are a deterrent message, not a supply threat. The distinction worth drawing is between rhetoric that prefigures action, typically accompanied by satellite-visible test activity or sanctions responses from Western governments, and rhetoric aimed at domestic or negotiating audiences, which this framing resembles. The follow-ons that have mattered in comparable episodes are any Defence Ministry or IRGC confirmation, fresh sanctions designations, and whether the statement lands during active diplomatic talks, where it can read as leverage rather than intent. As single-source lawmaker commentary, the signal is low-grade.