PREVIEW - US PCE INFLATION (13:30BST/08:30EDT)

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at , 20 minutes before this page
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

PREVIEW - US PCE INFLATION (13:30BST/08:30EDT)

Iraq's SOMO offered buyers October contract crude supplies at discounts to regional benchmarks of up to USD 37/bbl, according to reports, citing documents

Argentine economy minister says Japan has opened its market to Argentine beef

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
  • Analysts expect the PCE headline to rise by 0.4% M/M (prev. 0.2%), and the annual rate is seen ticking up to 3.8% Y/Y (prev. 3.7%); core PCE is expected to rise by 0.3% M/M (prev. 0.2%), with the annual rate of core PCE seen rising to 3.4% Y/Y (prev. 3.3%).
  • In the month, headline CPI picked-up in pace to 0.4% M/M (from 0.1%), though the annual rate was unchanged at 3.4% Y/Y; the core gauge rose by 0.3% M/M, above the expected and previous 0.2%, though the annual rate of core CPI slipped to 2.4% Y/Y from 2.5%. Headline PPI also picked-up, printing 0.4% M/M (from 0.1%), in line with expectations, while the annual rate rose to 5.4% Y/Y (from 4.8%, and above the expected 5.3%); core PPI rose 0.2% M/M, below the expected and previous 0.3%, though the annual rate of core PPI climbed to 4.6% Y/Y from 4.3%, in line with expectations.
  • At its policy meeting in September, Fed officials nudged up their headline PCE view for this year to 3.7% (from 3.6%), while core is seen at 3.4% Y/Y (revised up from 3.3%); both headline and core PCE are seen easing next year to 2.3% Y/Y and 2.5% Y/Y respectively.
  • Fed officials broadly agree that inflation is too high, and have noted that it has been above target for more than five years. At his post-meeting press conference in September, where the Fed unanimously voted to hike by 25bps, Chair Warsh said summer readings showed no meaningful improvement in underlying trends, estimating August PCE at around 3.6% Y/Y and core at 3.2% Y/Y. Schmid and Barkin described price pressures as broad-based rather than confined to energy. Goolsbee and Musalem see a growing demand-driven element, and Paulson and Williams cite AI-related demand. Goolsbee and Hammack warned that supply shocks are proving persistent, and several officials see risks for prices as tilted to the upside.
  • Another factor to note, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will release updated PCE deflator methodology, applied retroactively through Q1 2021. RBC estimates that core PCE’s annual pace is expected to fall 18bps, which would revise July’s reading to 3.1% from 3.3%. RBC analysts note that three changes drive this: portfolio management services will use a CES-based quantity series instead of nominal price deflation; computer software will use a new composite PPI/CPI deflator; and legal services will use a new deflator after the current CPI measure proved unreliable.
Context

PCE carries a standing advantage over CPI in that much of its monthly shape is inferable in advance from the CPI and PPI components already in hand, which is why the desk-level miss or beat on the core month-on-month print tends to be modest and the surprise, when it comes, is usually concentrated in the residual categories where sourcing differs. The harder question on this print is the wedge between the firmer sequential run implied by the upstream data and the disinflationary pull of the methodology revision, since a retroactive restatement of the deflator history reshapes the base against which the new month compounds and can shift the year-on-year rate independently of what the current month does. Episodes where revisions and fresh data arrive together have historically generated two-way confusion in the front end, with the initial reaction often reversing once the net effect on the level of the series is absorbed. The context that matters for the reaction function is the breadth of official commentary describing pressures as broad-based with upside skew: in that setting an upside core surprise has tended to move the front end and terminal pricing more than a symmetric downside one, because the asymmetry of the prevailing reaction function favours hawkish repricing. What follows the release is the mapping into the committee's own projection round and whether officials' prior estimates of the series prove close to the revised print, which is the tell for how much of the revision was already internalised.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free