PRIMER - Today’s Fedspeak includes: Waller, Kashkari, Musalem

Newsquawk StaffPublished
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

Every headline is on the live feed 20 minutes before this site.

PRIMER - Today’s Fedspeak includes: Waller, Kashkari, Musalem

ECB's Wunsch says that the case for lifting the minimum reserve requirement is not very clear or convincing

Maersk (MAERSKB DC) says it will raise its emergency fuel surcharge to 20% from October 12th

On the Newsquawk feed at , 20 minutes before this page.

Use the PlatformFree. No signup, no card.
  • 09:30BST/04:30EDT: Fed’s Waller (voter) speaks on the economic outlook. Waller gave remarks last week, but avoided comments on monpol. Speaking in early September before the FOMC meeting, Waller said he was leaning towards keeping rates steady if August inflation data shows continued progress, though he would consider a hike if inflation comes in hot; ultimately, he sided with the consensus in endorsing a hike to 3.75-4.00%. He described the previous FFR target of 3.50-3.75% as only slightly restricting demand, adding it may not take much inflation acceleration to prompt him toward tighter policy. Waller said elevated energy prices and tariffs are no longer a significant source of ongoing inflation pressure, though he sees some upside risks from AI-related technology costs.
  • 15:40BST/10:40EDT: Fed’s Kashkari (2026 voter) moderates a panel at a Minneapolis Fed event. Speaking last week, Kashkari said he has no strong view on an October hike, has pencilled in one more rate rise this year and another in 2027, adding that the Fed may have to hike more than expected depending on the economy. He said the economy remains surprisingly resilient, with strong consumer spending and a broadly healthy labour market, though housing is weak.
  • 18:40BST/13:40EDT: Fed’s Musalem (2028 voter) speaks on the economic outlook. Speaking in late September, Musalem described the economy as very strong, with the AI capex boom fuelling demand pressure, which is driving about half of current inflation, adding that policy remains somewhat accommodative after the last hike and long-run inflation expectations are consistent with 2%. He also said that central bankers need not make promises but should explain how and why policy decisions are made.

Context

This is a primer rather than fresh commentary, so the read-through rests on how the slate has been positioned previously rather than on anything new crossing the wire. Waller, a sitting voter with a track record of moving early toward the committee's eventual position, is the one markets have historically treated as a signal rather than noise; his stated framework, steady policy if inflation cooperates, tightening if it runs hot, defines the conditions the front end will trade around. Kashkari and Musalem are non-voters in the current year, which has typically capped their direct rate impact, though both sit on the hawkish side of the distribution and help map where the centre of gravity could drift. The common thread across all three is the tension between a resilient consumer and AI-linked demand pressure on one side and weakness in housing on the other, a split that has characterised past episodes where the committee debated whether policy was restrictive enough. The distinction worth drawing is between confirmation of the one-more-hike baseline already pencilled in and any upgrade to the more-than-expected tail risk Kashkari has flagged; the former is largely priced by the time it is repeated, the latter is what re-steepens the hawkish repricing. Follow-ons are whether any of the three frames the next inflation print as decisive, since conditioning policy on a single release has historically raised that release's market weight.

Related headlines

The feed had this first.

Use the Platform