US President Donald Trump is moving forward with his attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve over unproven allegations of mortgage fraud, ABC reports, citing sources

Efforts to remove a sitting Fed governor sit in a narrow category with little modern precedent, and episodes of attempted political interference with central bank personnel have historically turned on the legal question of what constitutes cause for removal rather than on the allegations themselves.

Newsquawk StaffPublished On the live feed at 3 more headlines followed before this page went public
Newsquawk headlinesUTC

Baker Hughes rig count: Total unch at 588, oil +3 at 454, nat gas -3 at 124

Russian sanctions bill said to be on track to pass the Senate vote

US President Donald Trump is moving forward with his attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve over unproven allegations of mortgage fraud, ABC reports, citing sources

Iraqi Islamic Resistance says we postponed the response to Saudi Arabia, Fars reports

OpenAI slows release of Astra model citing cyber capabilities, reports Axios

Open the platform and use it. The whole workspace is free to try, with no signup and no card. When you want the headlines arriving live instead of on a delay, Newsquawk Pro is £24.99 for 7 days.

Free. No signup, no card.
Context

The transmission channel in past episodes of institutional pressure on central banks has run through the inflation-risk premium embedded in longer maturities and the currency, with term premium and curve steepening the more common expression than front-end repricing, since near-term policy expectations are set by the committee as a whole. The distinction worth drawing is between the attempt and the outcome: governors have security of tenure protections that are typically tested in court before any vacancy arises, so the operative question is whether litigation delays or confirms the removal. Prior form matters here: sustained public pressure on the Fed from this administration has been a recurring feature, and markets have tended to fade headline-driven moves on personnel news unless the institution's operational independence is actually compromised. What is worth watching is whether other Board members or regional presidents comment publicly, any legal filing from the governor in question, and whether the episode broadens into scrutiny of other officials, which would shift the read from a single-seat dispute to a boardroom composition story. As a sourcing point, the report is secondhand and unconfirmed, a profile that in comparable political stories has frequently been walked back or qualified.

Related headlines

The whole workspace, free to try.

Try it free